Key takeaways
Many plants that start measuring OEE see a quick gain, then a plateau.
The reasons are usually the same:
The 12 OEE improvement strategies below remove those four blockers. Steps 1 to 3 fix the data and the focus, and step 12 fixes the review and the ownership.
If you need a refresher on the metric itself, start with our guide to overall equipment effectiveness.
OEE is a product of three percentages, so the lowest factor can mislead you.
Take a line with 84% availability, 83% performance and 97% quality. Its OEE is 67.6%.
Here is where the time goes on a shift with 450 minutes of planned production time:
| Category | How to calculate it | Minutes |
|---|---|---|
| Availability loss | 450 × (1 - 0.84) | 72.0 |
| Performance loss | 450 × 0.84 × (1 - 0.83) | 64.3 |
| Quality loss | 450 × 0.84 × 0.83 × (1 - 0.97) | 9.4 |
| Fully productive time | 450 × 0.84 × 0.83 × 0.97 | 304.3 |
Performance has the lowest percentage, but stops cost more time: 72 minutes against 64.
Performance losses only apply to the time the machine ran, so each point is worth fewer minutes. For the full method, see our OEE calculation guide.
Manual logs miss most short stops and tend to round durations to the nearest five or ten minutes.
Take stops and counts directly from the machine, through the PLC, a retrofit sensor or a camera, so the numbers no longer depend on memory.
Write down what counts as planned production time, the threshold for a short stop, and the ideal cycle time for each product.
If these change from week to week, your trend will move without anything changing on the floor.
Every line has one step that limits its output.
Improving a machine that is already waiting for material adds nothing. Our guide to bottleneck analysis shows how to find it.
Rank breakdowns by minutes lost and look for the machines and components that come back again and again.
Put those on a preventive schedule based on run hours or cycles, and train operators in basic care through autonomous maintenance.
Changeovers are planned stops, but they still reduce availability.
Separate the steps that need the machine stopped from the ones that can be done in advance, then move as many as possible outside the stop. See our SMED guide.
Every stop has at least two parts: the time until someone responds, and the time to repair.
Measure both. Clear escalation rules shorten the first, and spare parts plus machine history shorten the second.
Our guide to mean time to repair covers the repair side in detail.
For 15 ways to win back availability, read our playbook on how to reduce machine downtime.
Short stops rarely appear in manual logs, yet they can cost as much as a breakdown.
Count them by station and fix the top three: a guide rail, a sensor position, a product that is slightly out of spec. Our micro stops guide goes deeper.
Machines often run below their ideal speed because someone once reduced it "to be safe".
Find the original reason. If the problem behind it is fixed, restore the speed and watch quality closely.
A machine waiting for material, or waiting for the next machine to take its output, loses time through no fault of its own.
Short waits show up as short stops, and longer ones as unplanned stops, so the loss can land in performance or availability.
Look at material flow, buffers and the speed of the machines around it.
Many defects happen right after a changeover or restart, while settings are adjusted by trial and error.
Record the proven settings for each product and use them as the starting point every time.
Check the process where the defect is created, not only at final inspection.
Simple control charts help you catch drift before it produces scrap. See statistical process control.
Hold a short daily review at the line: yesterday's OEE, the top three losses, and one action for each.
Every action gets an owner and a due date, and is checked at every meeting until it is closed. Our daily OEE meeting guide gives a simple agenda.
| Loss (OEE factor) | First lever and usual owner |
|---|---|
| Breakdowns (Availability) | First lever: Preventive and autonomous maintenance Owner: Maintenance |
| Changeovers (Availability) | First lever: SMED Owner: Production engineering |
| Waiting for material or people (Availability) | First lever: Kitting, handover, escalation Owner: Production |
| Short stops (Performance) | First lever: Stop capture and small fixes Owner: Production and maintenance |
| Reduced speed (Performance) | First lever: Restore ideal speed Owner: Process engineering |
| Startup scrap (Quality) | First lever: Standard settings per product Owner: Production and quality |
| Production defects (Quality) | First lever: Process control at the source Owner: Quality |
For the full breakdown of each loss, read the six big losses.
For a side-by-side list of methods such as Pareto charts, 5 whys and TPM, see our guide to OEE improvement tools.
The line above runs 240 shifts a year, or 1,800 planned hours. Over 90 days, the team works on its top losses.
| Factor | Before and after |
|---|---|
| Availability | 84% to 88% SMED on the main changeover, preventive tasks on two repeat failures |
| Performance | 83% to 90% Three short-stop causes fixed |
| Quality | 97% to 98% Standard startup settings |
| OEE | 67.6% to 77.6% |
To put a value on hours like these, see our guide to the hidden factory.
Keep the plan on one page. One row per loss, reviewed every day.
The figures below are an example from a different line.
| Loss | Plan |
|---|---|
| Changeover on product B | Minutes per week: 240 Action: SMED workshop, pre-stage tools Owner: Production engineer Due: Week 3 Status: Open |
| Capper jams | Minutes per week: 150 Action: Replace worn guide rail, weekly check Owner: Maintenance lead Due: Week 1 Status: Done |
| Startup scrap | Minutes per week: 60 Action: Setting sheet per product Owner: Shift supervisor Due: Week 2 Status: In progress |
The minutes column keeps the list in the right order. The status column is what the daily meeting checks.
After 90 days, extend the method to the next machine once the first one's gains have held for several weeks.
Fabrico is a cloud-based MES and OEE platform for manufacturers, with maintenance management (CMMS) built in.
It collects stops and counts from PLCs, IoT sensors and AI cameras, calculates OEE in real time, and detects the micro stops manual logs miss.
Because the CMMS is part of the same platform, your team can turn a loss into a work order or a preventive maintenance plan, and track it until it is done.
The AI assistant answers questions about a machine's losses in plain language, and an Operational Assessment is available as an add-on.
See where your OEE is really lost: book a demo. For related metrics, read our guide to production efficiency.
Measure losses automatically, convert each factor into lost minutes, and fix the biggest losses on the bottleneck first.
Then turn every fix into a standard and review losses daily so the gains stay.
The one that loses the most minutes, which is not always the one with the lowest percentage.
Convert each factor into time, as in the minutes table above.
Plants that start capturing data automatically often find their first large, low-cost losses within weeks.
Sustained gains take longer, because each fix has to become a standard.
Set the target from your own baseline and your top losses, not from a benchmark.
If you know how many minutes each fix removes, you can calculate the expected OEE before you start.
Usually not. Most early gains come from shorter changeovers, fewer repeat failures and fewer short stops on existing machines.
It is a short list of losses, each with a size in minutes, an action, an owner, a due date and a status.
The template above is a good starting point.
Programați o întâlnire individuală cu experții noștri sau înscrieți-vă direct în planul nostru gratuit.
Nu este nevoie de card de credit!