What are the steps for a successful OEE implementation?
A successful OEE implementation follows four critical steps:
1. Automated Data Collection (PLC/IoT) to eliminate manual bias;
2. Real-time Loss Categorization based on the Six Big Losses;
3. Visual Root Cause Analysis using Computer Vision to catch micro-stops; and
4. Native CMMS Integration to ensure that performance drops automatically trigger technical interventions.
The "Dashboard Trap": Data Without Action
Paula, the Strategic Leader, has likely seen dashboards that look impressive in the boardroom but fail to increase output. This happens because the OEE software is a "System of Record" (it records the past) rather than a "System of Action" (it dictates the future).
According to the Hansen OEE Framework, low OEE is a symptom of the "Hidden Factory." To recover this, Mike (the Tactical Manager) needs more than a score; he needs a loop. If a filler on Line 2 is running at 5% below its rated speed, the system should not just wait for a weekly meeting—it should act.
Shifting from "Push" to "Pull" Maintenance
Most OEE implementations fail to integrate with the maintenance department. They continue to use "Push" maintenance—tasks scheduled by the calendar. The Smith & Hinchcliffe RCM Framework identifies this as the primary cause of "Maintenance Debt."
A unified OEE and CMMS strategy enables Condition-Directed (CD) Tasks. In this model, maintenance is "Pulled" by actual machine health. If OEE performance trends downward, Fabrico automatically triggers a prioritized work order in the CMMS, ensuring Tom (the Technician) is deployed to the right asset at the right time.
Visual Validation: The End of Tribal Knowledge
The biggest hurdle in OEE implementation is identifying the root cause of micro-stops (under 2 minutes). Operators often guess the reason, leading to "Tribal Knowledge" that is frequently wrong.
Fabrico’s Computer Vision (Inefficiencies Zoom-In) solves this. By capturing video clips of specific downtime events, Mike can visually validate the cause. This allows the team to update digital SOPs and checklists based on facts, ensuring the "Cure" is permanent.
OEE Strategy Matrix: Reporting vs. Action
| Capability |
Generic OEE Dashboard |
Fabrico System of Action |
| Data Integrity |
70% (Manual Coding) |
100% (Machine + Vision) |
| Maintenance Link |
❌ Manual/Disconnected |
✅ Native CMMS Loop |
| Root Cause Tool |
Pareto Chart Only |
Visual/Video RCA Evidence |
| Scheduling |
❌ Assumptions |
✅ Interactive Planning Board |
| Technician UX |
❌ Desktop-heavy |
✅ Mobile-first / Field-Ready |
| ROI Differentiator |
Better Reports |
Increased TEEP / Capacity |
The ROI of Unified Implementation
For Paula, the Value Fulcrum is the speed of ROI. A standalone OEE tool can take 6–12 months to show results because the team must manually learn how to react to the data.
Fabrico is designed for a 3-to-4 month full deployment. By automating the response to production losses, it identifies the "Bad Actors"—the 20% of machines causing 80% of your downtime—and forces the technical cure. It isn't just an OEE implementation; it’s a revenue recovery engine.
Login
Blog
