
Key takeaways
Short answer: Vibration analysis monitors rotating-equipment vibration signatures to predict failure. Most rotating-equipment failures change vibration patterns weeks before breakdown. Common patterns: imbalance shows at running speed, misalignment at twice running speed, bearing defects at high frequency. Triggers for action: rising amplitude, new characteristic frequencies, deviation from historical baseline. Worth the investment on critical rotating equipment. See also Infrared Thermography Basics.
Rotating equipment in good condition vibrates predictably:
Failures change the pattern:
The patterns are characteristic; analysis identifies the failure mode before it produces a breakdown.
Most plants start with amplitude and frequency analysis. Phase analysis is for balancing work.
Imbalance: high amplitude at 1x running speed. Cause: unbalanced rotor.
Misalignment: 2x running speed component. Cause: coupling misalignment.
Bent shaft: 1x and 2x with phase characteristics. Cause: bent or warped shaft.
Looseness: broadband content, fractional harmonics. Cause: loose mounting or worn parts.
Bearing defects: high-frequency content (5x running speed and higher). Cause: bearing element damage.
Gear mesh problems: tooth-mesh frequency (gear teeth x running speed). Cause: gear wear.
Action: investigate, schedule maintenance, plan replacement.
Walk-around route. Technician with handheld analyzer reads each asset on a route. Common for medium-criticality assets.
Wireless sensors. Battery-powered sensors send periodic readings. Common for hard-to-reach assets.
Online continuous monitoring. Wired sensors stream real-time data. Common for critical assets.
Cost and value scale with deployment method.
Vibration is one tool, not the whole solution.
Rotating equipment with bearings, gears, or imbalance risk.
1. Vibration data without analysis. Sensors deployed; nobody interprets. Data piles up; alerts ignored.
2. Threshold-only alerting. Misses trend signals. Use both.
3. No baseline. Without historical comparison, current readings are unanchored.
4. Universal monitoring. Vibration on cheap assets does not pay back.
Vibration alerts should:
Without CMMS integration, alerts go to email and get lost.
Walk-around analyzer: €3,000-10,000 plus technician time.
Wireless sensors: €200-500 per point.
Online continuous: €1,000-5,000 per point plus infrastructure.
Scale to criticality. Critical assets get continuous; mid get wireless; lower-criticality get walk-around.
Vibration catches failures before they produce downtime. Plants with mature vibration programs see Availability move up as catches translate to planned vs unplanned response.
A modern CMMS integrates with vibration monitoring systems, generates WOs on alerts, tracks the resolution, and updates asset history with findings.
Fabrico's CMMS integrates with vibration monitoring systems, generates condition-driven WOs, and updates asset history with vibration-driven findings.
See how Fabrico captures this automatically — explore OEE for manufacturing or book a demo.
Weeks for bearings; days for some imbalance issues. Depends on degradation rate.
For mature programs yes. For starting, contract analysis is common.
Vibration standard with severity zones (A through D) for different machine classes.
Critical and important motors yes. Cheap motors with redundancy may not pay back.
Increasingly. Trained models catch patterns that thresholds miss.