Menu
5 Best Infor EAM (HxGN) Alternatives for Manufacturing (2025)

5 Best Infor EAM (HxGN) Alternatives for Manufacturing (2025)

Key Takeaways

 

  • The "Heavyweight" Problem: Infor EAM (now HxGN EAM) is a massive enterprise tool designed for complex supply chains, but it is often too slow and rigid for the factory floor.

  • The Usability Gap: Heavy EAMs require dedicated administrators. Modern factories need software that technicians can use without a manual.

  • The Top Contenders: We review Fabrico, SAP PM, Fiix, and others to help you find an agile alternative.

5 Best Infor EAM (HxGN) Alternatives for Manufacturing (2025)

Infor EAM (recently rebranded as HxGN EAM after being acquired by Hexagon) is a titan in the asset management space.

It is incredibly powerful for managing global supply chains, fleet logistics, and public sector infrastructure.

But for discrete manufacturing, it is often an anchor, not a sail.

Plant Managers ("Paula") frequently complain that Infor implementation takes years, not months.

Maintenance Managers ("Mike") struggle to get technicians to use the complex interface, leading to poor data entry.

If you need a system that offers Industrial Power without the Enterprise Bloat, here are the 5 best Infor EAM alternatives for 2025.

 

1. Fabrico: The "Agile Production" Solution

Best For: Manufacturers who want to replace "Heavy EAM" with "Connected Reliability."

Fabrico is the modern answer to legacy EAMs. It strips away the bloat (features you never use) and doubles down on the features manufacturers actually need: OEECondition Monitoring, and Mobile Usability.

Why Manufacturers Switch to Fabrico:

 

  • Production Integration: Infor focuses on the asset's financial life. Fabrico focuses on the asset's daily performance. By integrating OEE natively, Fabrico links maintenance directly to production output.

  • Speed of Value: An Infor project is a career-defining event. A Fabrico deployment is a monthly task. You can be live and capturing data in 2-4 weeks.

  • Mobile Experience: Fabrico’s app is designed for the technician standing at the machine, not the planner sitting at a desk. It is fast, visual, and intuitive.

  • The "RCM" Workflow: Fabrico simplifies Reliability-Centered Maintenance. It forces structured failure codes and root cause analysis without the heavy administrative burden of an EAM.

 

The Verdict: If you want to stop feeding the software and start fixing machines, Fabrico is the agile upgrade.

 

 

2. SAP PM (Plant Maintenance)

Best For: Companies already committed to the SAP ecosystem.

If your organization demands a Tier-1 ERP solution, SAP PM is the most direct competitor to Infor.

  • Pros: Total financial integration. If your finance team runs on SAP, using PM eliminates the need for connectors. It is the definition of "Enterprise Standard."

  • Cons: Like Infor, it suffers from poor usability. Technicians hate it. It requires expensive consultants to customize. It is a lateral move in terms of complexity.

  • The Difference: Choose SAP PM if your CIO mandates a "Single Vendor" strategy.

 

3. IBM Maximo

Best For: Utilities and massive infrastructure.

Maximo is the only system heavier than Infor. It is the standard for nuclear plants, railways, and city grids.

  • Pros: Unmatched depth for linear assets and regulatory compliance. It can handle scale that few others can.

  • Cons: It is incredibly expensive and difficult to change. If you run a factory making automotive parts or food products, Maximo is overkill.

  • The Difference: Maximo is for infrastructure; Fabrico is for production.

 

4. Fiix (Rockwell Automation)

Best For: Rockwell-heavy automation environments.

Fiix offers a middle ground—more robust than a simple app, but less heavy than Infor.

  • Pros: Good balance of features. Since the Rockwell acquisition, it connects well with shop floor hardware.

  • Cons: It is moving up-market, becoming more complex and expensive. It requires a dedicated admin to get the most out of it.

  • The Difference: A solid enterprise choice, but less agile than Fabrico.

 

5. Limble CMMS

Best For: Dropping the complexity entirely.

If your Infor implementation failed because "nobody used it," Limble is the extreme opposite reaction.

  • Pros: Pure simplicity. It focuses 100% on the technician experience. It is easy to buy and easy to launch.

  • Cons: It is not an EAM. You lose the deep supply chain and financial lifecycle modeling of Infor. It is a maintenance execution tool, not a corporate asset ledger.

  • The Difference: Limble is for execution; Infor is for administration.

 

Comparison Matrix: EAM vs. CMMS

Feature Fabrico Infor EAM SAP PM Limble
Architecture Modern SaaS Legacy / Cloud ERP Module Modern SaaS
OEE Integration ✅ Native ⚠️ Add-on ❌ Custom ❌ No
User Experience Excellent Complex Poor Excellent
Implementation Weeks Years Months Weeks
Target Manufacturing Supply Chain Finance General

 

 

Summary: Simplify Your Stack

Infor EAM is a powerful tool for managing a global supply chain. But for the factory floor, it is often an obstacle to reliability.

  • Stick with Infor if: You are managing a global fleet of trucks or a complex distribution network.

  • Choose SAP/Maximo if: You are bound by corporate IT mandates for a single vendor.

  • Choose Fabrico if: You are a manufacturer. If you want a system that connects your Machines (OEE) to your Maintenance (CMMS) in a way that technicians actually enjoy using, Fabrico is the right choice.

 

Get agile.

[Book a Demo with Fabrico] to see how we replace enterprise bloat with industrial speed.

Latest from our blog

Define Your Reliability Roadmap
Validate Your Potential ROI: Book a Live Demo
Define Your Reliability Roadmap
By clicking the Accept button, you are giving your consent to the use of cookies when accessing this website and utilizing our services. To learn more about how cookies are used and managed, please refer to our Privacy Policy and Cookies Declaration