Key takeaways
Short answer: A maintenance engineer keeps equipment running today: executing repairs, PMs, and work orders. A reliability engineer makes failures rarer tomorrow: analysing failure modes, eliminating root causes, and setting maintenance strategy. When one person wears both hats, urgent always beats important and reliability work never happens. See also oee for manufacturing.
Maintenance is measured by speed of recovery; reliability by absence of failure. If the same person owns both, the pager always wins and the reliability backlog grows forever. Separating them protects the improvement work.
Both rely on the same CMMS failure history. The maintenance engineer uses it to plan the next repair; the reliability engineer uses it to ensure that repair is never needed again.
Reliability work shows up as rising Availability and fewer breakdowns in OEE. Maintenance work shows up as faster recovery (lower MTTR). Track both to see the strategy paying off.
See how Fabrico captures this automatically on your lines — explore OEE for manufacturing or book a demo.
In small plants yes, but reliability work must be ring-fenced or it never happens.
The reliability engineer, with maintenance input.
No — it makes maintenance smaller and more planned over time.
MTBF and failure rate trend; for maintenance, MTTR and PM compliance.